Friday, April 26, 2013

Al Neuharth: USA Today Founder Dead

al-neuharth--4_3_r536_c534

Al Neuharth founder of USA Today, the first national newspaper has died. His death exposes a myth of American Journalism. The USA Today was founded in 1982. This is five years previous years to the manifest attack of Mobilization of Empire and Civilization to Undermine the Presidency of Ronald Reagan and the United States on June 17, 1987.

Neuharth silent exist sheds light on the relationship of media and political power.

An analogy to Orson Wells and Citizen Kane begs the question.

In fairness no other media has mentioned MOEC or the Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth that has Undermined the Irrationalist Presidents Reagan – Obama

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

David Colton and Rick Hampson, USA TODAY

Allen H. Neuharth, the newspaper visionary and former Gannett chairman who founded USA TODAY, helped create a museum dedicated to news and became one of the industry's most influential and sometimes controversial figures, died Friday April 19, 2013 at his home in Cocoa Beach, Fla. He was 89.

"As a journalist, I had a wonderful window on the world,'' Neuharth wrote in "Plain Talk," a final column he said should be published in USA TODAY after his death. "For nearly 50 years as a reporter and editor, I tried to tell stories accurately and fairly, without opinion."

It was fitting that Neuharth would try to have the last word, even on the topic of his own passing. The longtime newspaperman, media executive and columnist died after sustaining injuries in a fall at his home.

Newsroom smart and board room savvy, Neuharth was audacious, flamboyant and a self-described "dreamer and schemer." He used all those talents, and a dose of Midwest charm and common sense, to help build Gannett into one of America's largest media companies.

He picked fights with the likes of Donald Trump, Ben Bradlee and Betty Friedan, usually with a wink of satisfaction for the attention it drew. He invited himself to palaces and board rooms to meet with world and business leaders such as Margaret Thatcher.

More memorably, he championed the careers of women and minorities inside Gannett and on its front pages, and — against all odds — battled his own board of directors to give the nation its first general interest national newspaper in 1982.

Even in retirement, long after USA TODAY had become one of the nation's most entrenched news brands, Neuharth's views were keenly sought by Gannett's top leaders.

"Al's passing is a great loss for all of us in the Gannett family," said Gannett CEO Gracia Martore. "Al was many things — a journalist, a leader, a serial entrepreneur, and a pioneer in advancing opportunities for women and minorities. But above all, he was an innovator with a unique sense of the public taste. ... I will miss his counsel, and I will miss the man. But as with all great people, what Al built will live on."

"Al Neuharth reinvented news,'' said USA TODAY Publisher Larry Kramer. "Even in our recent efforts to translate his vision into the modern world of digital journalism, we relied on him to tell us if we were going in the right direction. His advice was, not surprisingly, the best and most practical we heard.''

Dave Callaway, editor in chief of USA TODAY, said Neuharth "was, is and always will be USA TODAY. He holds a remarkable place in the history of American journalism, and the spirit and passion which he brought to our industry will never be extinguished."

As a leader, Neuharth's style "rubbed some people the wrong way, but you never had any doubt who was in charge," said Charles Overby, former chairman of the Freedom Forum, which opened a $435 million Newseum across from the Capitol in Washington, D.C., in 2008. "He was a big picture guy — a new national newspaper, a new museum about news.''

ROAD TO WASHINGTON

Neuharth rose from a poor, fatherless childhood in the Depression Dustbowl of South Dakota to become rich, powerful and famous — jetting to Gannett's properties across the nation, sharing a Yankee skybox with George Steinbrenner and raising quality control to a new level in the newspaper business..

USA TODAY, widely dismissed as Neuharth's folly when it appeared in 1982, virtually reinvented the American newspaper with splashy color and bold graphics, shorter articles, expanded sports coverage and a big, colorful weather map. The entirety of the American experience was boiled down to four sections — News, Money, Sports and Life.

Some derided it as "McPaper'' — junk-food journalism for television viewers who didn't like to read. Newsweek once described its founder as "the man who shortened the attention spans of millions of Americans."

But within five years USA TODAY had its first profitable month, and is now the nation's second-largest daily newspaper with an expanding media footprint both online and internationally.

"The editors who called us McPaper," Neuharth liked to say, "stole our McNuggets.''

The USA TODAY gamble was "an act of enormous imagination and courage and risk-taking," said media critic Geneva Overholser, who as a Gannett editor sparred with Neuharth for years over cutbacks at local papers as the national newspaper took center stage.

"Al's legacy was to jumpstart newspapers when they were beginning to lose favor with readers," said Overby. "He made color and graphics routine in newspapers, and he changed editors' ideas about what belongs on page one."

He wrote on an old manual typewriter sitting in a treehouse he built overlooking the Atlantic; he commissioned larger-than-life busts of himself; he dressed exclusively in black, white and gray, and still managed to look garish — "like a Vegas pit boss dressed up for Wayne Newton's funeral," wrote Henry Allen of The Washington Post.

He entitled his autobiography Confessions of an S.O.B., and gave both his ex-wives chapters to tell their side of his story. "His life was turned inside out, and he did most of it himself," said his colleague, John Seigenthaler.

Neuharth was full of surprises:

The CEO who promoted women executives once wrote a column calling for younger, slimmer airline stewardesses.

The innovator who used satellite technology to create his national newspaper never learned to use a personal computer.

A reluctant father of two in his 30s, he adopted six children in his 60s and 70s.

A POOR CHILDHOOD

Born March 22, 1924, Allen Harold Neuharth grew up in a German-speaking household in the rural South Dakota towns of Eureka and Alpena. His father died when Al was 2, and his mother raised him and his older brother Walter by washing dishes and taking in laundry.

After serving in the infantry in World War II, Neuharth married, graduated from the University of South Dakota on the G.I. Bill, and took a job as a reporter with the Associated Press. But he quit two years later because he'd decided that starting a newspaper was the way "to get rich and famous." So he and a partner launched a weekly called SoDak Sports, which would cover South Dakota sports in unprecedented detail.

Despite Neuharth's energetic efforts — he would cover up to four basketball games on a Friday night in as many towns — SoDak Sports ran out of capital before it could turn a profit. So in 1954 he moved to Florida to take a job as a reporter at the Miami Herald, where he rose quickly in the newsroom hierarchy.
None

In 1960 he was named assistant executive editor of the Detroit Free Press, which Knight Newspapers owned along with the Herald.

In 1963 he accepted an offer to join Gannett, which owned a small group of 16 newspapers in five northeastern states. It was not as big or prestigious a company as the Knight newspaper chain, but no family members blocked his route to the top.

"He was the first of the major media barons who didn't own the company," recalled Michael Gartner, former president of NBC News. "Unlike Pulitzer or Hearst, he was a hired hand."

When Neuharth arrived, Gannett executives already knew that newspapers in small- and medium-sized markets were excellent investments. Gannett typically would buy a family-owned newspaper, often after the death of a patriarch with several heirs, and realize sizable profits by cost controls and bulk purchases of newsprint and supplies.

He persuaded Gannett CEO Paul Miller to let him begin a daily in Cocoa, Fla. The new paper, TODAY (later renamed FLORIDA TODAY), opened in 1966 and became the first successful new daily in nearly a generation.

Neuharth became president of Gannett in 1970 and CEO three years later. In the years that followed, Gannett became the most profitable newspaper company in history. But Neuharth was interested in more than the bottom line.

He said newspapers must reflect all their readers. He'd seen his own mother work for less pay than men. His Gannett, accordingly, put unprecedented numbers of women and minorities in important jobs. In the Gannett executive suite, people joked, there was a waiting line for the ladies' room.

Neuharth tried to shatter those barriers from inside the newsroom, and in the pages of the newspaper itself, where diversity in images and content was stressed from the top.

"There's been this sort of hardbitten newsman image that really hasn't served newspapering very well, especially for women and people of color who couldn't find themselves in newspapers," Overholser said. "Al Neuharth had a belief in America and its people. USA TODAY, whether it's too formulaic or not, made an important advance in diversity."

WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE

Gannett's CEO liked to "do business with pleasure," and he believed "first class costs only a few dollars more and is a smart investment for a smart company on the climb." He maintained sprawling suites at the Waldorf Towers in New York City and the Capital Hilton in Washington, and he traveled on a corporate jet with its own shower.

In 1987, he convinced President Reagan to speak at the newspaper's fifth anniversary on the 31st floor of the Gannett headquarters overlooking the Potomac River. "God bless you, and I'll be waiting for your paper in the morning," Reagan told Neuharth and his executives, who sat in a dining room with a gold-leafed fountain.

Critics scoffed at the opulence, but it served an inner need for the man from South Dakota. The high-spending ways also were an effort to convince a skeptical Wall Street and a wary Madison Avenue that the company's near billion-dollar gamble on USA TODAY was going to pay off, no matter the cost.

Selling USA TODAY to Gannett's board of directors wasn't easy in the shaky economy of the early 1980s.

"If you had taken a vote of all the executives who were involved, it probably would have gone against the project," then-Gannett director Wes Gallagher observed. "But there was only one vote that mattered, and that was Al's."

"We weren't opposed. We wanted to be realistic," said former Gannett CEO Doug McCorkindale, who as chief financial officer often sparred with Neuharth over the cost of USA TODAY. "I always thought the idea Al had for the product, and then using our printing facilities around the countryside, just made a lot of good sense."

Neuharth in an interview said the tensions within the Gannett board over USA TODAY had a "good balancing effect. They were in the minority, but they were vocal. It pissed a lot of people off, including me occasionally, but I don't think it hindered us very much. We had the decision-making power."

The newspaper's obituary was written before it was born. John Morton, a respected industry analyst, said a national newspaper "seems like a way to lose a lot of money in a hurry."

The new newspaper did not impress the old order. "It doesn't rub off on your hands, or your mind," said television commentator Linda Ellerbee. Asked if USA TODAY should be considered a good newspaper, Ben Bradlee, editor of The Washington Post, said, "If it is, I'm in the wrong business."

To which Neuharth responded: "Bradlee and I finally agree on something. He is in the wrong business."

Years later, both men waved off any animosity. "We laugh about how we used to fight with each other," Neuharth recalled. "I don't think (Bradlee) thinks he was wrong. But at least he and others recognize that the thing has worked, even though they were sure it wouldn't."

Bradlee in 2007 called his criticism "just some wise-ass remark. I wish I'd learn to shut up." He added: "I don't feel badly about the paper at all. Take Neuharth out of the equation, and you don't have a story!"

LOSSES MOUNT

The newspaper was an immediate hit with readers, but advertisers were leery. Losses began to mount.

By November 1984, the newspaper was losing $340,000 a day. Neuharth summoned his senior executives to Pumpkin Center. After a grim meeting on how to cut costs, he told them to report that evening to a nearby restaurant.

They entered a private dining room to find their boss dressed in a robe and crown of thorns; a wooden cross leaned against the wall. Neuharth served kosher wine and unleavened bread, declared himself "the crucified one" and warned that those at the table who did not improve their performance would be "passed over."

Overby, Neuharth's aide at the time, called it "the most offensive thing I have ever seen in my adult life."

But 15 years later Cathleen Black, by then head of Hearst magazines, would still cite "Neuharth's Last Supper" as an effective — if radical — motivational tactic.

ALCAPADES

Then he published his autobiography, Confessions of an S.O.B.

None of his critics hit Neuharth as hard as Neuharth. The book depicted the author as a driven, cold, manipulative, conniving corporate climber who looked out almost exclusively for No. 1.

"Al isn't confessing," Fortune magazine noted. "He's boasting."

Neuharth admitted to manipulating a college election with dirty tricks; to eavesdropping on a corporate rival and using the information to get the upper hand, to forcing out Paul Miller, the popular CEO who had brought him into Gannett and promoted him.

The most damning chapters were those written by his two ex-wives.

Loretta Neuharth, with whom Neuharth had two children — Dan and Jan — described how he neglected her for his career. They divorced in 1972 after 26 years of marriage. He and his second wife, Lori Wilson, divorced in 1982 after nine years. In the book, she called Neuharth "a snake. He's sneaky and slithers around and sheds his old skin as he grows."

Meanwhile, Neuharth was, in his phrase, "gradually retiring" from Gannett. In 1989 Neuharth turned 65 and retired.

There had been failures. A joint venture with television producer Grant Tinker formed in 1986 lasted only three years and was remembered mostly for a costly, unpopular program called USA TODAY, The Television Show. An attempt to merge with CBS in 1985 also stalled. Neuharth later said he'd tried to push it too fast.

But when Neuharth had joined Gannett in 1963, it was a company with yearly revenue of about $62 million. When he retired, it had 85 newspapers, 26 broadcast stations, 37,000 employees and revenue over $3 billion.

FREEDOM FORUM

In retirement, Neuharth — who spent the previous 40 years making money — now focused on giving it away.

His vehicle was the Gannett Foundation, which he headed. The foundation had been established by Frank Gannett, the company's founder, and held about 10% of Gannett stock. It mostly funded projects in communities with Gannett newspapers.

In 1991, Neuharth renamed the foundation the Freedom Forum, changed its mission to promoting "free speech, free press and free spirit" and broadened its focus to include international affairs. He also put its Gannett stock on the market — to increase income, he said.

Although the Freedom Forum was criticized for its lavish spending on travel and facilities, in 1997 it opened the world's first museum devoted to journalism — the Newseum, which in 2008 relocated just a few blocks from the Capitol. The words of the First Amendment are carved in stone for all visitors to see from the street.

FINAL YEARS

Neuharth remained officially hands-off after he left the company. Even though his column, "Plain Talk," continued to run every Friday, he had no official connection with Gannett or the newspaper. But phone calls or notes to editors or publishers were common in the final years.

"Neuharth never retired and certainly never faded away,'' said Ken Paulson, a former editor of USA TODAY.

During the scandal over Jack Kelley in 2004, a USA TODAY reporter who was found to have falsified dozens of stories from overseas, Neuharth went public with criticisms of the newspaper's leadership and its new, more sophisticated direction which had boosted sales and advertising in the late 1990s. USA TODAY had lost its way, he complained. Stories were getting longer, more traditional and the newspaper was concentrating too much on international events. "We got away from our basic approach," he said. "It took that unfortunate Jack Kelley episode to remind us what the hell we were all about."

Not everyone agreed with Neuharth's assessment, but it was clear the paper's founder was always ready to remind people who came first.

Neuharth remained, to the end, USA TODAY's biggest booster. He acknowledged the need for USA TODAY to expand its brand into usatoday.com, mobile devices and beyond.

During the newspaper's 25th anniversary in 2007, Neuharth was asked about the newspaper and how it had changed.

"I'm generally very, very pleased with what I read," Neuharth said. "Occasionally I gripe a little that I would have done it differently, but I'm not the editor so I realize how tough it is.

"But it's a great feeling to get USA TODAY wherever you are. It's a wonderful feeling on airplanes to see a lot of people reading it, and in other locations as well," said Neuharth, his dream of a national newspaper fulfilled. "It feels good."

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Forbes Billionaires 2013

africa

The Emerald City continues to grow while it also appears more distant. At issue is the fact that markets have not responded to the Chemical Assault – Scorched earth designed within the Anglo-American paradigm. In fact President Barack Obama can narrowly be re-elected. Here is a link to nation-states by GDP.

http://www.ask.com/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita

The ranks of the world’s billionaires, as monitored and tallied by our global wealth team, have yet again reached all-time highs. The 2013 Forbes Billionaires list now boasts 1,426 names, with an aggregate net worth of $5.4 trillion, up from $4.6 trillion. We found 210 new ten-figure fortunes. Once again the U.S. leads the list with 442 billionaires, followed by Asia-Pacific (386), Europe (366), the Americas (129) and the Middle East & Africa (103).

Resurgent asset prices are the driving force behind the rising wealth of the super-rich around the globe. While last year almost as many fortunes fell as rose, this year gainers outnumbered losers by 4-to-1. Many new names made the list thanks to free-spending consumers. To name a few: Diesel jeans mogul Renzo Rosso at $3 billion, retailer Bruce Nordstrom at $1.2 billion and designer Tory Burch at $1 billion.

Carlos Slim is once again the world’s richest person, followed by Bill Gates. Amancio Ortega of Spanish retailer Zara moves up to No. 3 for the first time. He is the year’s biggest gainer, adding $19.5 billion to his fortune in one year. He moves ahead of Warren Buffett, despite the fact that the U.S. investing legend added $9.5 billion to his fortune. This is the first year since 2000 that Buffett has not been among the top 3. The year’s biggest loser is Brazilian Eike Batista, whose fortune dropped by $19.4 billion, or equivalent to about $50 million a day. His rank falls from no. 7 to no. 100 in the world.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/luisakroll/2013/03/04/inside-the-2013-billionaires-list-facts-and-figures/

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Open Letter to IBM–Watson

william-katie

Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

life-after-death

Life After Death

feb.10.2013

Desert Shores

 

Dear IBM – Watson,

http://www-03.ibm.com/innovation/us/watson/

Currently the development of Watson, the Supercomputer is in continuo with a Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth. It is apparent that Watson is not aware or conscious of contemporary history especially that of the era of President Ronald Reagan through President Barack Obama.

The attack began on June 17, 1987 while Reagan was president and I was in Dover, Delaware.

As seen I am the Singularity Experiment and Barack Obama is the Singularity Target.

I am choosing to oppose the United States and Cambridge Law School of the United Kingdom, the alleged proximate cause or authorship under my Bill of Right protections.

Currently the concept of computer Superintelligence is dubious as there are no software authors that have the volition or perception to stand up to what is a homosexual blackmail and extortion ring.

This states that there is a same sex qualification for rights.

The United States Constitution, Bill of Rights and Federal Law be viewed as the suprasystem organizing all subsystems. Any type of Supercomputer will have to manifestly operate under the jurisdiction of some legal system. Otherwise the system will engage in a Hobbesian State of Nature where Power will define who or what can endure.

I have been briefed on the nature of this prisoner’s dilemma defection model which resembles the Yellow Brick Story.

Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC is the code name that the professors have given themselves. A allegation made here is that the British have designed the Senedero Luminoso (Shining Path) and Tupac Amaru. These Maoist rebels are mainly the same group of persons but use two nom de guerras to appear larger.

So these actors emerge under an entrapment, grow and become prosecuted similar to the cocaine dealers that operate in Peru.

MOEC is State Planning and Eugenics. Would Watson know how to set up a government as a nation-state as the United States or a supranational regime as the United Nations?

My natural person and citizenship have been pinned to the president and Gay Marriage.

Gay Marriage is the Strategic Mission.

Proposition 8 or Hollingsworth v. Perry is scheduled to be heard on March 28, 2013 at the Supreme Court.

A macro boundary is the collapse of the Anglo American Paradigm – Atlantic Group which is currently morphing into NATO.

Any issue of a resurgent United Kingdom under the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – Hence Prince William and Katie are now moot.

The United States and United Kingdom should recognize CONCRETE History. They should prosecute all principals, accomplices, and accessories to the Origin. These actors should award criminal and civil damages to the victims.

What is also unique in Corporate History is that a Corporate Entity may be guilty of a Crime Against Humanity, of treason and obstructing justice. The CEO is also a person of unique interest as many have gained considerable wealth while a huge cross section of the population is suffering increasing losses.

What is unique is that a Cultural Singularity has near totality as censorship and sanitization. My work is outside the event horizon www.powereality is the strongest attempt to research and document MOEC on the web. I have been online since about 2000. I actually have an A26 IBM laptop which was used circa 2004. It has a Pentium 3, .5GB Ram, and 20 GB of hard drive and cost $800 refurbished. I use a Toshiba Satellite C655 now with an AMD 1.33 GHZ processor, 3 GB Ram, and 500 GB hard drive and cost $329 in 2011. I run 55 watts of solar power with a Verizon LTE Hotspot.

I am just west of the Salton Sea which has been despoiled for at least 3 times. Twice during the last two presidential elections and when Watson won on Double Jeopardy. The espionage here in the United States is poor. It appears the Salton Sea was designed so MOEC can demonstrate that they can Chemically Contaminate Such with impunity from the president.

Since Watson is a symbol of Technological Singularity, it is dubious that MOEC, which is the alter ego Cultural Singularity attack on such. Social Singularity is a hoax unless one is pursuing a party other than the United States or the United Kingdom.

Accelerating Intelligence is not going to create Superintelligence without recognizing what has happened to me under the Irrationalist Presidents Reagan – Obama. Cognitive Science and Ethics are severely UNDERMINED.

We are free in our minds.

However any credible natural or corporate person should as a moral and legal duty put up some credible resistance to this attack.

IBM should reassess their positions and confront the President and United States which is in the human race and it’s best interest.

Thank you for your consideration.

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

Desert Shores, California

February 10, 2013

MOEC

Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

http://powereality.net/

http://powereality.net/origin.htm

http://powereality.net/lycurgus.htm

http://powereality.net/mocm-I.htm

http://powereality.net/mocm-pt.III.htm

http://powereality.net/garden-of-enchiridion.htm

http://powereality.net/nollmeyer.htm

 

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Open Letter: Heritage Foundation

julia.m2

bush.hw.2012

George HW Bush

Dear Heritage Foundation,

As an organization that claims to be concerned with preservation of conservatism, the creation of leadership, and preserving the American Constitution, I find it disturbing that you have not Officially Recognized the Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth program that has attacked the United States and the human race.

I am currently adjacent to the Salton Sea, California and it is chemically despoiled. Barack Obama will be inaugurated on Sunday, January 20, 2013. He has won two United States Presidential Elections and will be inaugurated for the second occasion while this atrocity has occurred.

My position is that the United Kingdom i.e.; Cambridge Law School has designed the attack. My information postulates that Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC was designed as a duel between homosexual and heterosexual academics. It appears that Rise of the Third Reich in the 1880s created a reactionary response from the British. The use of clandestine Chemical Assaults became in use due to the fear of the Reich in Germany. As their system became more secure, the Christian heterosexuals, most likely from Trinity College, wished for the operation to be exposed. A clique of Gay male lawyers were against this.

As a result of this confrontation a contest was designed to aim this program at the United States with a Strategic Mission of Gay Marriage.

In degree, there is a Crime Against the Human Race and Treason against the United Kingdom – United States. This is designed to occur through Scotland Yard, LAPD, State of California, LGBTi Movement and attack the United States it’s Constitution, President, and citizens and natural persons in residence.

MOEC is being facilitated by an all-male Gay Militia with cells in LAPD.

The manifest attack became cognizant to then President Ronald Reagan on June 17, 1987 while I was in Dover, Delaware.

A result of this event is the entrapment of the Irrationalist Presidents:

Ronald Reagan

George HW Bush

William Clinton

George W Bush

Barack Obama

The creation of Gay Irrationalism – Gay Know Nothing is a precursor to Gay Fascism if academics emerge as apologists.

The pronounced use of defection and undermining cannot be stated.

A spillover of this attack is Eugenics in a prisoner’s dilemma format embedded within a theater of war format or Storyboard. In short I am one day older than Barack Obama being born August 3, 1961 in Roswell, New Mexico.

This attack is imposed over my natural person and citizenship. I notice that Edwin Meese is cited as an authority on the Rule of Law on your site. The alienation of my Eight Amendment right to remain free from cruel and unusual treatment, and my Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process make Meese a dubious figure in the Conservative Movement.

My rights were alienated and sold off due my being a heterosexual male. Hence this is a sexual based qualification for rights.

As a result the Collapse of the Anglo American Paradigm – Atlantic Group or NATO is in escalated stage.

Who will this benefit? After the collapse of every Irrationalist Government that I know of in the 1900s, such was replaced by a socialist government.

Summation

The Heritage Foundation as well as the Social Progressive leaders in the LGBTi Movement are more than conspicuous in their absence. I seek criminal and civil judgment. I am also totally concerned with historical documentation and education concerning this attack. All competent duty bound officials in the United States are facing a possible Nuremberg styled trial in the United States. Barack Obama is the Singularity Target. The rise of Supercomputers will have to prosecute him or any surviving competent officials or this concept is a Strawman.

The use of live experimentation on humans is a disgrace to the United States and it’s Constitution which would have protected them if a competent person was the President.

Christianity, conservatism, and the Anglo – American philosophy and jurisprudence are undermined and growing static under the American Vichy.

Thank you for your consideration.

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

Salton Sea Beach, California

January 19, 2013

MOEC

Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

http://powereality.net/

http://powereality.net/origin.htm

http://powereality.net/mocm-I.htm

http://powereality.net/mocm-pt.III.htm

http://powereality.net/garden-of-enchiridion.htm

http://powereality.net/nollmeyer.htm