Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Fascism - An Emergent Structure Emerges

drip-painting-bigbang1

Big Bang

This an excellent small article that describes Fascism. It is quite shocking and compelling to observe how degraded the United States and the world has become. I am writing mostly federal officials that have jurisdiction over this disaster and will be more assertive in my these confrontations over the disintegration of constitutional rights.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

Fascism is to be distinguished from interventionism, or the mixed economy. Interventionism seeks to guide the market process, not eliminate it, as fascism did. Minimum-wage and antitrust laws, though they regulate the free market, are a far cry from multiyear plans from the Ministry of Economics.

Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission. Levels of consumption were dictated by the state, and “excess” incomes had to be surrendered as taxes or “loans.” The consequent burdening of manufacturers gave advantages to foreign firms wishing to export. But since government policy aimed at autarky, or national self-sufficiency, protectionism was necessary: imports were barred or strictly controlled, leaving foreign conquest as the only avenue for access to resources unavailable domestically. Fascism was thus incompatible with peace and the international division of labor—hallmarks of liberalism.

Fascism embodied corporatism, in which political representation was based on trade and industry rather than on geography. In this, fascism revealed its roots in syndicalism, a form of socialism originating on the left. The government cartelized firms of the same industry, with representatives of labor and management serving on myriad local, regional, and national boards—subject always to the final authority of the dictator’s economic plan. Corporatism was intended to avert unsettling divisions within the nation, such as lockouts and union strikes. The price of such forced “harmony” was the loss of the ability to bargain and move about freely.

To maintain high employment and minimize popular discontent, fascist governments also undertook massive public-works projects financed by steep taxes, borrowing, and fiat money creation. While many of these projects were domestic—roads, buildings, stadiums—the largest project of all was militarism, with huge armies and arms production.

The fascist leaders’ antagonism to communism has been misinterpreted as an affinity for capitalism. In fact, fascists’ anticommunism was motivated by a belief that in the collectivist milieu of early-twentieth-century Europe, communism was its closest rival for people’s allegiance. As with communism, under fascism, every citizen was regarded as an employee and tenant of the totalitarian, party-dominated state. Consequently, it was the state’s prerogative to use force, or the threat of it, to suppress even peaceful opposition.

If a formal architect of fascism can be identified, it is Benito Mussolini, the onetime Marxist editor who, caught up in nationalist fervor, broke with the left as World War I approached and became Italy’s leader in 1922. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. (p. 280)

Before his foray into imperialism in 1935, Mussolini was often praised by prominent Americans and Britons, including Winston Churchill, for his economic program.

Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property. (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27)

Both nations exhibited elaborate planning schemes for their economies in order to carry out the state’s objectives. Mussolini’s corporate state “consider[ed] private initiative in production the most effective instrument to protect national interests” (Basch 1937, p. 97). But the meaning of “initiative” differed significantly from its meaning in a market economy. Labor and management were organized into twenty-two industry and trade “corporations,” each with Fascist Party members as senior participants. The corporations were consolidated into a National Council of Corporations; however, the real decisions were made by state agencies such as the Instituto per la Ricosstruzione Industriale, which held shares in industrial, agricultural, and real estate enterprises, and the Instituto Mobiliare, which controlled the nation’s credit.

Hitler’s regime eliminated small corporations and made membership in cartels mandatory.1 The Reich Economic Chamber was at the top of a complicated bureaucracy comprising nearly two hundred organizations organized along industry, commercial, and craft lines, as well as several national councils. The Labor Front, an extension of the Nazi Party, directed all labor matters, including wages and assignment of workers to particular jobs. Labor conscription was inaugurated in 1938. Two years earlier, Hitler had imposed a four-year plan to shift the nation’s economy to a war footing. In Europe during this era, Spain, Portugal, and Greece also instituted fascist economies.

In the United States, beginning in 1933, the constellation of government interventions known as the New Deal had features suggestive of the corporate state. The National Industrial Recovery Act created code authorities and codes of practice that governed all aspects of manufacturing and commerce. The National Labor Relations Act made the federal government the final arbiter in labor issues. The Agricultural Adjustment Act introduced central planning to farming. The object was to reduce competition and output in order to keep prices and incomes of particular groups from falling during the Great Depression.

It is a matter of controversy whether President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal was directly influenced by fascist economic policies. Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator.

Sheldon Richman. "Fascism." The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. 2008. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved March 4, 2009 from the World Wide Web:

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html

Friday, April 25, 2014

Human Resources and Obsolescence

As sanitization and corruption development the workplace more than competence, more rigorous employee testing is prima facie. The world zeitgeist has degraded under Irrationalism since June, 1987.

Espionage is the primary and war by proxy are the modus operandi of Superpowers.

The hedonistic and narcissistic cultural that permeates decline was the result of social engineering read Undermining. Hence the low credit boom bust cycle was orchestrated to lead civilization to where it is at the present.

Robots and automation are poised to displace the informant-criminal for hire whom wishes to work for the police.

The Wizard of Oz was a foil to expose the quid pro quo versus merit based promotion system worldwide.

The corporations that survive under the current system will develop fascism. The lower skilled displaced workers will be placed or forced to live on state programs.

When postal employees are caught throwing mail out of their car and hiding mail this is a signal that the robots are coming.

If I were a 25 year old construction worker, a truck driver, or a cubicle worker running WYSIWYG programs with a family I would reconsider if my job will still be there in 25 years.

These three jobs will not.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Satya Nadella

Is Satya Nadella The Right Man For The Job?
Trefis Team Trefis Team, Contributor

nadella.s.2014

Sattya means goodness. The new CEO will have to navigate Microsoft through an age of censorship and sanitization. Ex CEOs Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have not left any credible achievements on the Attack Against Singularity. The academic Ivory Tower, The Whitehouse, boardroom, and tenured professorship  will be a harder niche to hide within as damage escalates

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

The five-month long search for a new CEO ended with the appointment of Satya Nadella – an electrical engineer and a 22-year Microsoft veteran. A careful analysis of the profiles of other contenders such as Alan Mulally indicates that the management selected the best candidate for the job, considering the company wants to strengthen its footprint in cloud services and the mobile vertical.

Nadella has extensive experience working with cloud technologies compared to some of the other candidates who were from different industries. Satya Nadella is not only a company insider but also helped grow Microsoft’s Cloud and Enterprise Group — which accounted for $20.3 billion in revenue and $8.2 billion in operating income last fiscal year (ended June 2013). As the chief of CEG, Nadella oversaw Microsoft’s server software for corporate customers. He was also in charge of several consumer cloud products such as Office 365, as well as the Bing search engine, Xbox Live and Skype. Over the course of his tenure, he was instrumental in transforming the company’s technology culture from client services to cloud infrastructure and services.

While Nadella faces stiff challenges heading the 100,000+ employees, we believe he can successfully integrate different company divisions backed by his extensive experience at Microsoft. We expect Nadella to gradually disclose his growth strategy for Microsoft in the upcoming events. However, it remains to be seen whether Nadella’s engineering background, along with Bill Gates’ close involvement in product decisions, will help the company turn over a new leaf in the growing cloud domain. We note that Gates appeared to be delighted that Nadella requested his higher level of involvement. Reports indicate, moreover, that Nadella is to view the full board as his boss. Considering that Ballmer and Gates are on the board, along with Chairman John Thompson, this is no surprise.

Microsoft named Satya Nadella, former head of the cloud and enterprise division, as its new CEO. Furthermore, the company founder Bill Gates has stepped down from his role as chairman for a new role as technology adviser to CEO. Board member John Thompson, former CEO of Symantec SYMC +2.05%, will serve as Microsoft MSFT +1.05%’s new chairman.

The software giant announced on Tuesday that Nadella will replace Steve Ballmer, who in August said that he would step down as CEO of Microsoft within 12 months. While it is too early to speculate on the strategy the company might adopt going forward, this appointment signals Microsoft’s strong commitment to business growth through its cloud offering, which registered over 100% growth last fiscal.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2014/02/06/microsoft-names-satya-nadella-as-its-new-ceo/

Monday, January 6, 2014

What is Neo-Fascism?

What is Neo-Fascism?

Alturas CA
Dateline 9-2-2006

Hello ALL

Here are some interesting points to consider in arriving at what is neo-fascist. This related to the use of electronic surveillance and totalitarianism which you may have had direct experience.

Bottom line, are the neo-cons driving this agenda neo-fascist? Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, published research on fascism [18] in which he examined the fascist regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each fascist State:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarceration of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists; terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military are glamorized.

5. Rampant sexism - The government of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are intertwined - Government in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation are often the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated, or are severely restricted.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassinations of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Benito Mussolini - who knew something about fascism - had a more straightforward definition: “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

Abraham Lincoln stated, “I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed.”

The small, but ruthless, group of men, the “money power” described by Lincoln, has stolen democracy from the American people. An ever-growing number of informed Americans, however, are fighting a brave, but desperate rear-guard action to retrieve that democracy. Will we give them our total support now, or simply sit back and watch as the entire planet is taken back to the dark ages? “The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.”

Jim Macgregor is a 57 year old retired doctor. For many years he was a family practitioner and visiting Medical Officer to Glenochil Prison, one of Scotland's high security prisons. Through his prison work, he developed a special interest in miscarriages of justice and is a member of the Miscarriage of Justice Organization. MOJO (Scotland).

You can contact Jim at gairmoj@aol.com


This article was first published at www.surfaceonline.org

Friday, April 26, 2013

Al Neuharth: USA Today Founder Dead

al-neuharth--4_3_r536_c534

Al Neuharth founder of USA Today, the first national newspaper has died. His death exposes a myth of American Journalism. The USA Today was founded in 1982. This is five years previous years to the manifest attack of Mobilization of Empire and Civilization to Undermine the Presidency of Ronald Reagan and the United States on June 17, 1987.

Neuharth silent exist sheds light on the relationship of media and political power.

An analogy to Orson Wells and Citizen Kane begs the question.

In fairness no other media has mentioned MOEC or the Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth that has Undermined the Irrationalist Presidents Reagan – Obama

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

David Colton and Rick Hampson, USA TODAY

Allen H. Neuharth, the newspaper visionary and former Gannett chairman who founded USA TODAY, helped create a museum dedicated to news and became one of the industry's most influential and sometimes controversial figures, died Friday April 19, 2013 at his home in Cocoa Beach, Fla. He was 89.

"As a journalist, I had a wonderful window on the world,'' Neuharth wrote in "Plain Talk," a final column he said should be published in USA TODAY after his death. "For nearly 50 years as a reporter and editor, I tried to tell stories accurately and fairly, without opinion."

It was fitting that Neuharth would try to have the last word, even on the topic of his own passing. The longtime newspaperman, media executive and columnist died after sustaining injuries in a fall at his home.

Newsroom smart and board room savvy, Neuharth was audacious, flamboyant and a self-described "dreamer and schemer." He used all those talents, and a dose of Midwest charm and common sense, to help build Gannett into one of America's largest media companies.

He picked fights with the likes of Donald Trump, Ben Bradlee and Betty Friedan, usually with a wink of satisfaction for the attention it drew. He invited himself to palaces and board rooms to meet with world and business leaders such as Margaret Thatcher.

More memorably, he championed the careers of women and minorities inside Gannett and on its front pages, and — against all odds — battled his own board of directors to give the nation its first general interest national newspaper in 1982.

Even in retirement, long after USA TODAY had become one of the nation's most entrenched news brands, Neuharth's views were keenly sought by Gannett's top leaders.

"Al's passing is a great loss for all of us in the Gannett family," said Gannett CEO Gracia Martore. "Al was many things — a journalist, a leader, a serial entrepreneur, and a pioneer in advancing opportunities for women and minorities. But above all, he was an innovator with a unique sense of the public taste. ... I will miss his counsel, and I will miss the man. But as with all great people, what Al built will live on."

"Al Neuharth reinvented news,'' said USA TODAY Publisher Larry Kramer. "Even in our recent efforts to translate his vision into the modern world of digital journalism, we relied on him to tell us if we were going in the right direction. His advice was, not surprisingly, the best and most practical we heard.''

Dave Callaway, editor in chief of USA TODAY, said Neuharth "was, is and always will be USA TODAY. He holds a remarkable place in the history of American journalism, and the spirit and passion which he brought to our industry will never be extinguished."

As a leader, Neuharth's style "rubbed some people the wrong way, but you never had any doubt who was in charge," said Charles Overby, former chairman of the Freedom Forum, which opened a $435 million Newseum across from the Capitol in Washington, D.C., in 2008. "He was a big picture guy — a new national newspaper, a new museum about news.''

ROAD TO WASHINGTON

Neuharth rose from a poor, fatherless childhood in the Depression Dustbowl of South Dakota to become rich, powerful and famous — jetting to Gannett's properties across the nation, sharing a Yankee skybox with George Steinbrenner and raising quality control to a new level in the newspaper business..

USA TODAY, widely dismissed as Neuharth's folly when it appeared in 1982, virtually reinvented the American newspaper with splashy color and bold graphics, shorter articles, expanded sports coverage and a big, colorful weather map. The entirety of the American experience was boiled down to four sections — News, Money, Sports and Life.

Some derided it as "McPaper'' — junk-food journalism for television viewers who didn't like to read. Newsweek once described its founder as "the man who shortened the attention spans of millions of Americans."

But within five years USA TODAY had its first profitable month, and is now the nation's second-largest daily newspaper with an expanding media footprint both online and internationally.

"The editors who called us McPaper," Neuharth liked to say, "stole our McNuggets.''

The USA TODAY gamble was "an act of enormous imagination and courage and risk-taking," said media critic Geneva Overholser, who as a Gannett editor sparred with Neuharth for years over cutbacks at local papers as the national newspaper took center stage.

"Al's legacy was to jumpstart newspapers when they were beginning to lose favor with readers," said Overby. "He made color and graphics routine in newspapers, and he changed editors' ideas about what belongs on page one."

He wrote on an old manual typewriter sitting in a treehouse he built overlooking the Atlantic; he commissioned larger-than-life busts of himself; he dressed exclusively in black, white and gray, and still managed to look garish — "like a Vegas pit boss dressed up for Wayne Newton's funeral," wrote Henry Allen of The Washington Post.

He entitled his autobiography Confessions of an S.O.B., and gave both his ex-wives chapters to tell their side of his story. "His life was turned inside out, and he did most of it himself," said his colleague, John Seigenthaler.

Neuharth was full of surprises:

The CEO who promoted women executives once wrote a column calling for younger, slimmer airline stewardesses.

The innovator who used satellite technology to create his national newspaper never learned to use a personal computer.

A reluctant father of two in his 30s, he adopted six children in his 60s and 70s.

A POOR CHILDHOOD

Born March 22, 1924, Allen Harold Neuharth grew up in a German-speaking household in the rural South Dakota towns of Eureka and Alpena. His father died when Al was 2, and his mother raised him and his older brother Walter by washing dishes and taking in laundry.

After serving in the infantry in World War II, Neuharth married, graduated from the University of South Dakota on the G.I. Bill, and took a job as a reporter with the Associated Press. But he quit two years later because he'd decided that starting a newspaper was the way "to get rich and famous." So he and a partner launched a weekly called SoDak Sports, which would cover South Dakota sports in unprecedented detail.

Despite Neuharth's energetic efforts — he would cover up to four basketball games on a Friday night in as many towns — SoDak Sports ran out of capital before it could turn a profit. So in 1954 he moved to Florida to take a job as a reporter at the Miami Herald, where he rose quickly in the newsroom hierarchy.
None

In 1960 he was named assistant executive editor of the Detroit Free Press, which Knight Newspapers owned along with the Herald.

In 1963 he accepted an offer to join Gannett, which owned a small group of 16 newspapers in five northeastern states. It was not as big or prestigious a company as the Knight newspaper chain, but no family members blocked his route to the top.

"He was the first of the major media barons who didn't own the company," recalled Michael Gartner, former president of NBC News. "Unlike Pulitzer or Hearst, he was a hired hand."

When Neuharth arrived, Gannett executives already knew that newspapers in small- and medium-sized markets were excellent investments. Gannett typically would buy a family-owned newspaper, often after the death of a patriarch with several heirs, and realize sizable profits by cost controls and bulk purchases of newsprint and supplies.

He persuaded Gannett CEO Paul Miller to let him begin a daily in Cocoa, Fla. The new paper, TODAY (later renamed FLORIDA TODAY), opened in 1966 and became the first successful new daily in nearly a generation.

Neuharth became president of Gannett in 1970 and CEO three years later. In the years that followed, Gannett became the most profitable newspaper company in history. But Neuharth was interested in more than the bottom line.

He said newspapers must reflect all their readers. He'd seen his own mother work for less pay than men. His Gannett, accordingly, put unprecedented numbers of women and minorities in important jobs. In the Gannett executive suite, people joked, there was a waiting line for the ladies' room.

Neuharth tried to shatter those barriers from inside the newsroom, and in the pages of the newspaper itself, where diversity in images and content was stressed from the top.

"There's been this sort of hardbitten newsman image that really hasn't served newspapering very well, especially for women and people of color who couldn't find themselves in newspapers," Overholser said. "Al Neuharth had a belief in America and its people. USA TODAY, whether it's too formulaic or not, made an important advance in diversity."

WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE

Gannett's CEO liked to "do business with pleasure," and he believed "first class costs only a few dollars more and is a smart investment for a smart company on the climb." He maintained sprawling suites at the Waldorf Towers in New York City and the Capital Hilton in Washington, and he traveled on a corporate jet with its own shower.

In 1987, he convinced President Reagan to speak at the newspaper's fifth anniversary on the 31st floor of the Gannett headquarters overlooking the Potomac River. "God bless you, and I'll be waiting for your paper in the morning," Reagan told Neuharth and his executives, who sat in a dining room with a gold-leafed fountain.

Critics scoffed at the opulence, but it served an inner need for the man from South Dakota. The high-spending ways also were an effort to convince a skeptical Wall Street and a wary Madison Avenue that the company's near billion-dollar gamble on USA TODAY was going to pay off, no matter the cost.

Selling USA TODAY to Gannett's board of directors wasn't easy in the shaky economy of the early 1980s.

"If you had taken a vote of all the executives who were involved, it probably would have gone against the project," then-Gannett director Wes Gallagher observed. "But there was only one vote that mattered, and that was Al's."

"We weren't opposed. We wanted to be realistic," said former Gannett CEO Doug McCorkindale, who as chief financial officer often sparred with Neuharth over the cost of USA TODAY. "I always thought the idea Al had for the product, and then using our printing facilities around the countryside, just made a lot of good sense."

Neuharth in an interview said the tensions within the Gannett board over USA TODAY had a "good balancing effect. They were in the minority, but they were vocal. It pissed a lot of people off, including me occasionally, but I don't think it hindered us very much. We had the decision-making power."

The newspaper's obituary was written before it was born. John Morton, a respected industry analyst, said a national newspaper "seems like a way to lose a lot of money in a hurry."

The new newspaper did not impress the old order. "It doesn't rub off on your hands, or your mind," said television commentator Linda Ellerbee. Asked if USA TODAY should be considered a good newspaper, Ben Bradlee, editor of The Washington Post, said, "If it is, I'm in the wrong business."

To which Neuharth responded: "Bradlee and I finally agree on something. He is in the wrong business."

Years later, both men waved off any animosity. "We laugh about how we used to fight with each other," Neuharth recalled. "I don't think (Bradlee) thinks he was wrong. But at least he and others recognize that the thing has worked, even though they were sure it wouldn't."

Bradlee in 2007 called his criticism "just some wise-ass remark. I wish I'd learn to shut up." He added: "I don't feel badly about the paper at all. Take Neuharth out of the equation, and you don't have a story!"

LOSSES MOUNT

The newspaper was an immediate hit with readers, but advertisers were leery. Losses began to mount.

By November 1984, the newspaper was losing $340,000 a day. Neuharth summoned his senior executives to Pumpkin Center. After a grim meeting on how to cut costs, he told them to report that evening to a nearby restaurant.

They entered a private dining room to find their boss dressed in a robe and crown of thorns; a wooden cross leaned against the wall. Neuharth served kosher wine and unleavened bread, declared himself "the crucified one" and warned that those at the table who did not improve their performance would be "passed over."

Overby, Neuharth's aide at the time, called it "the most offensive thing I have ever seen in my adult life."

But 15 years later Cathleen Black, by then head of Hearst magazines, would still cite "Neuharth's Last Supper" as an effective — if radical — motivational tactic.

ALCAPADES

Then he published his autobiography, Confessions of an S.O.B.

None of his critics hit Neuharth as hard as Neuharth. The book depicted the author as a driven, cold, manipulative, conniving corporate climber who looked out almost exclusively for No. 1.

"Al isn't confessing," Fortune magazine noted. "He's boasting."

Neuharth admitted to manipulating a college election with dirty tricks; to eavesdropping on a corporate rival and using the information to get the upper hand, to forcing out Paul Miller, the popular CEO who had brought him into Gannett and promoted him.

The most damning chapters were those written by his two ex-wives.

Loretta Neuharth, with whom Neuharth had two children — Dan and Jan — described how he neglected her for his career. They divorced in 1972 after 26 years of marriage. He and his second wife, Lori Wilson, divorced in 1982 after nine years. In the book, she called Neuharth "a snake. He's sneaky and slithers around and sheds his old skin as he grows."

Meanwhile, Neuharth was, in his phrase, "gradually retiring" from Gannett. In 1989 Neuharth turned 65 and retired.

There had been failures. A joint venture with television producer Grant Tinker formed in 1986 lasted only three years and was remembered mostly for a costly, unpopular program called USA TODAY, The Television Show. An attempt to merge with CBS in 1985 also stalled. Neuharth later said he'd tried to push it too fast.

But when Neuharth had joined Gannett in 1963, it was a company with yearly revenue of about $62 million. When he retired, it had 85 newspapers, 26 broadcast stations, 37,000 employees and revenue over $3 billion.

FREEDOM FORUM

In retirement, Neuharth — who spent the previous 40 years making money — now focused on giving it away.

His vehicle was the Gannett Foundation, which he headed. The foundation had been established by Frank Gannett, the company's founder, and held about 10% of Gannett stock. It mostly funded projects in communities with Gannett newspapers.

In 1991, Neuharth renamed the foundation the Freedom Forum, changed its mission to promoting "free speech, free press and free spirit" and broadened its focus to include international affairs. He also put its Gannett stock on the market — to increase income, he said.

Although the Freedom Forum was criticized for its lavish spending on travel and facilities, in 1997 it opened the world's first museum devoted to journalism — the Newseum, which in 2008 relocated just a few blocks from the Capitol. The words of the First Amendment are carved in stone for all visitors to see from the street.

FINAL YEARS

Neuharth remained officially hands-off after he left the company. Even though his column, "Plain Talk," continued to run every Friday, he had no official connection with Gannett or the newspaper. But phone calls or notes to editors or publishers were common in the final years.

"Neuharth never retired and certainly never faded away,'' said Ken Paulson, a former editor of USA TODAY.

During the scandal over Jack Kelley in 2004, a USA TODAY reporter who was found to have falsified dozens of stories from overseas, Neuharth went public with criticisms of the newspaper's leadership and its new, more sophisticated direction which had boosted sales and advertising in the late 1990s. USA TODAY had lost its way, he complained. Stories were getting longer, more traditional and the newspaper was concentrating too much on international events. "We got away from our basic approach," he said. "It took that unfortunate Jack Kelley episode to remind us what the hell we were all about."

Not everyone agreed with Neuharth's assessment, but it was clear the paper's founder was always ready to remind people who came first.

Neuharth remained, to the end, USA TODAY's biggest booster. He acknowledged the need for USA TODAY to expand its brand into usatoday.com, mobile devices and beyond.

During the newspaper's 25th anniversary in 2007, Neuharth was asked about the newspaper and how it had changed.

"I'm generally very, very pleased with what I read," Neuharth said. "Occasionally I gripe a little that I would have done it differently, but I'm not the editor so I realize how tough it is.

"But it's a great feeling to get USA TODAY wherever you are. It's a wonderful feeling on airplanes to see a lot of people reading it, and in other locations as well," said Neuharth, his dream of a national newspaper fulfilled. "It feels good."

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Forbes Billionaires 2013

africa

The Emerald City continues to grow while it also appears more distant. At issue is the fact that markets have not responded to the Chemical Assault – Scorched earth designed within the Anglo-American paradigm. In fact President Barack Obama can narrowly be re-elected. Here is a link to nation-states by GDP.

http://www.ask.com/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita

The ranks of the world’s billionaires, as monitored and tallied by our global wealth team, have yet again reached all-time highs. The 2013 Forbes Billionaires list now boasts 1,426 names, with an aggregate net worth of $5.4 trillion, up from $4.6 trillion. We found 210 new ten-figure fortunes. Once again the U.S. leads the list with 442 billionaires, followed by Asia-Pacific (386), Europe (366), the Americas (129) and the Middle East & Africa (103).

Resurgent asset prices are the driving force behind the rising wealth of the super-rich around the globe. While last year almost as many fortunes fell as rose, this year gainers outnumbered losers by 4-to-1. Many new names made the list thanks to free-spending consumers. To name a few: Diesel jeans mogul Renzo Rosso at $3 billion, retailer Bruce Nordstrom at $1.2 billion and designer Tory Burch at $1 billion.

Carlos Slim is once again the world’s richest person, followed by Bill Gates. Amancio Ortega of Spanish retailer Zara moves up to No. 3 for the first time. He is the year’s biggest gainer, adding $19.5 billion to his fortune in one year. He moves ahead of Warren Buffett, despite the fact that the U.S. investing legend added $9.5 billion to his fortune. This is the first year since 2000 that Buffett has not been among the top 3. The year’s biggest loser is Brazilian Eike Batista, whose fortune dropped by $19.4 billion, or equivalent to about $50 million a day. His rank falls from no. 7 to no. 100 in the world.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/luisakroll/2013/03/04/inside-the-2013-billionaires-list-facts-and-figures/

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Open Letter to IBM–Watson

william-katie

Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

life-after-death

Life After Death

feb.10.2013

Desert Shores

 

Dear IBM – Watson,

http://www-03.ibm.com/innovation/us/watson/

Currently the development of Watson, the Supercomputer is in continuo with a Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth. It is apparent that Watson is not aware or conscious of contemporary history especially that of the era of President Ronald Reagan through President Barack Obama.

The attack began on June 17, 1987 while Reagan was president and I was in Dover, Delaware.

As seen I am the Singularity Experiment and Barack Obama is the Singularity Target.

I am choosing to oppose the United States and Cambridge Law School of the United Kingdom, the alleged proximate cause or authorship under my Bill of Right protections.

Currently the concept of computer Superintelligence is dubious as there are no software authors that have the volition or perception to stand up to what is a homosexual blackmail and extortion ring.

This states that there is a same sex qualification for rights.

The United States Constitution, Bill of Rights and Federal Law be viewed as the suprasystem organizing all subsystems. Any type of Supercomputer will have to manifestly operate under the jurisdiction of some legal system. Otherwise the system will engage in a Hobbesian State of Nature where Power will define who or what can endure.

I have been briefed on the nature of this prisoner’s dilemma defection model which resembles the Yellow Brick Story.

Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC is the code name that the professors have given themselves. A allegation made here is that the British have designed the Senedero Luminoso (Shining Path) and Tupac Amaru. These Maoist rebels are mainly the same group of persons but use two nom de guerras to appear larger.

So these actors emerge under an entrapment, grow and become prosecuted similar to the cocaine dealers that operate in Peru.

MOEC is State Planning and Eugenics. Would Watson know how to set up a government as a nation-state as the United States or a supranational regime as the United Nations?

My natural person and citizenship have been pinned to the president and Gay Marriage.

Gay Marriage is the Strategic Mission.

Proposition 8 or Hollingsworth v. Perry is scheduled to be heard on March 28, 2013 at the Supreme Court.

A macro boundary is the collapse of the Anglo American Paradigm – Atlantic Group which is currently morphing into NATO.

Any issue of a resurgent United Kingdom under the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – Hence Prince William and Katie are now moot.

The United States and United Kingdom should recognize CONCRETE History. They should prosecute all principals, accomplices, and accessories to the Origin. These actors should award criminal and civil damages to the victims.

What is also unique in Corporate History is that a Corporate Entity may be guilty of a Crime Against Humanity, of treason and obstructing justice. The CEO is also a person of unique interest as many have gained considerable wealth while a huge cross section of the population is suffering increasing losses.

What is unique is that a Cultural Singularity has near totality as censorship and sanitization. My work is outside the event horizon www.powereality is the strongest attempt to research and document MOEC on the web. I have been online since about 2000. I actually have an A26 IBM laptop which was used circa 2004. It has a Pentium 3, .5GB Ram, and 20 GB of hard drive and cost $800 refurbished. I use a Toshiba Satellite C655 now with an AMD 1.33 GHZ processor, 3 GB Ram, and 500 GB hard drive and cost $329 in 2011. I run 55 watts of solar power with a Verizon LTE Hotspot.

I am just west of the Salton Sea which has been despoiled for at least 3 times. Twice during the last two presidential elections and when Watson won on Double Jeopardy. The espionage here in the United States is poor. It appears the Salton Sea was designed so MOEC can demonstrate that they can Chemically Contaminate Such with impunity from the president.

Since Watson is a symbol of Technological Singularity, it is dubious that MOEC, which is the alter ego Cultural Singularity attack on such. Social Singularity is a hoax unless one is pursuing a party other than the United States or the United Kingdom.

Accelerating Intelligence is not going to create Superintelligence without recognizing what has happened to me under the Irrationalist Presidents Reagan – Obama. Cognitive Science and Ethics are severely UNDERMINED.

We are free in our minds.

However any credible natural or corporate person should as a moral and legal duty put up some credible resistance to this attack.

IBM should reassess their positions and confront the President and United States which is in the human race and it’s best interest.

Thank you for your consideration.

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

Desert Shores, California

February 10, 2013

MOEC

Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

http://powereality.net/

http://powereality.net/origin.htm

http://powereality.net/lycurgus.htm

http://powereality.net/mocm-I.htm

http://powereality.net/mocm-pt.III.htm

http://powereality.net/garden-of-enchiridion.htm

http://powereality.net/nollmeyer.htm